From Humanoid Faults to Manipulated Consensus, 30

Additionally, this is another heavily exploited fault because the exploiters know what the culmination of being flammable is, and that is what they want from us particularly: our fondness for anathemas. Once someone or something is excommunicated, in the cosy shade of the wall we erect we don’t have to go to any trouble any more.

It’s worth mentioning here how anathemas and excommunications conflict with the basics of human and civil rights – or common sense, for that matter.
One ought to be enabled to confront one’s accusers and accusations with equal rights? The walls of anathemas do not restrict themselves to excommunicating the subject merits in plain view, but they take pains to excommunicate even the mere daring to look at the subject in order to know what those merits are in the first place.
One ought to be enabled to freely question anyone and anything as answers lack only where someone’s got something to hide? The walls of anathemas take pains to excommunicate as well questioning labels in order to know the merits they are based upon.
To build an impenetrable fortress, there’s nothing like making immoral, guilty and dangerous not only what’s excommunicated, but also the reasons why it is, investigating such reasons, and the mere daring to look in that direction too much. And guess who are the soulless brutes defending that fortress and making common sense immoral, guilty and dangerous?
History is fed up with rabid dogs with blown fuses joining the ranks and lighting the torches of holy wars and stakes, as we never seem to learn any lesson about being potential trouble sources manipulated by suppressives exploiting our flammableness.