From Humanoid Faults to Manipulated Consensus, 25

Because as usual this leak in our hull is exploited heavily and systematically, so I invite you to observe for yourself whether or not mainstream media use emotional incitement as a planned routine, the high voltage of deliberately gross emotional “ads” to bypass our rationality, while “unofficial” media tend to use cold hard facts and detailed discussions – in an eternal implicit plea to our common sense and willingness to get back in touch with ourselves. And then I ask you if, in the light of all this, you deem fit the widespread indulgence of calling these leaks in the hull “being human”.

We’re phoney:

Now and then opinions ought to be based on evaluated information, not on prejudices and fixations alone, but even when we know that our information may well stand some improvement and review, even if we do know it is likely to be false and/or incomplete, even if we do know that further information exists, information that we ought to check in order to form an honest opinion, not only we refuse to confront these further information, not only we settle with our faulty information, but after that refusal we even have the nerviness to continue spreading our faulty opinions based on faulty information, thus contributing to the spreading of falseness.
What kind of a person is one who protects his blinkers, hides behind them, and is proud of wearing them, an apprentice plague−spreader? Before objecting to this label as excessive, think of the combined effect that millions of such behaviours added up to the mainstream media apparatus can have on the amount of effort needed to open people’s eyes and keep them open…
Additionally, it may be worth mentioning just in passing here that one of the infinite strategies of a suppressive is just that of remaining ignorant – in a covertly intentional way – so that his or her actions will “involuntarily” produce damage – if possible “accidentally” just where the damage will be greater.