The Mission of Betrayal: Shepherd Wolves, Red Herrings and Poisoned Meatballs, 6

Capitalist here is meant in its non−potential trouble source sense: not as left−wing puppets against right−wing puppets with both thus serving their common puppeteers, but as people looking moneypulators straight in the eye.

Doublespeak and its inner face, doublethink, are but one of the reasons why Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty−Four is among the fundamental texts for the education of any human being as such: it points out clearly for one to confront what is the exact opposite of confront itself, which has been called “reasonableness”, and defined as “not recognizing something illogical for what it is”: something illogical indeed. And it points out clearly as well, so we can confront them too, what are the consequences of reasonableness, that is, how serious an instrument of suppression and a sign of a potential trouble source condition reasonableness is.
The “double” prefix is where reasonableness resides: doublethink consists in accepting as valid at the same time both something and its opposite; doublespeak consists in expressing such opposites verbally, and so typically humanoid this verbal expression is that it even exists as a figure of speech, called “oxymoron”: the union of two contradictory terms referring to the same entity, with the effect of a paradox. The etymon of the term further underlines the point: it comes from the greek oksýs: acute, e mōrós: foolish, deranged.

Goes without saying that twisting harm into benefit, entangling good and evil with one another, is hardly for good, and hardly in your best interest.

Some examples of doublethink and doublespeak in Ninety Eighty−Four?
The three Party’s slogans:
War is peace
Freedom is slavery
Ignorance is force