The Banker-King and Banker-Politician Criminal Conspiracy, 2

Besides, there was also another contributing factor, one of historical and global impact: the power of money was outdoing the power of constituted authority. We know that everything is but agreement, therefore when one commands others to give one something in exchange for less or even nothing, this occurs if – and only if – the others agree; whatever the reason why they agree, should they not agree, no such exchange would take place: “Shoot me, and shove it!” One may also threat others into agreeing, such as with weapons and uniforms, but both those threatened and those wearing the uniforms should agree for the threat to be effective. Evidently, selling one’s bows for money sounded less unfair an exchange than giving them away as a legal obligation; one of the reasons being probably that in the eyes of people aristocracy had already largely betrayed any duty of providing them with a sound and fair rule, while money masters were still far from getting caught with their hands in even more demonic a betrayal: tampering with the neighbour’s purchasing power with debt money and the infinite debt trap. As much evidently, aristocracy were realizing being swept off its feet by money masters, as the power slowly moved from their hands to those of the money masters, out of the frying pan into the fire. So when defeating an enemy is not an option, allying with it is. They may well have wasted even a couple of centuries competing and fighting each other, but realizing this was just a matter of time anyway.

It has been observed how a powerful motive for the ruler to ally with the banker is his or her megalomania, if not his or her outright craving for social engineering: tampering with his or her subjects is an expensive pastime, and the outcome of this alliance is an inextinguishable source of free money to pay for such amusement at the expense of those subjects, their children, and the children of their children, as taxpayers. This may raise doubts about who’s the boss in this alliance. Well, such doubts are obviously banished by observing who’s to gain the most, and it happens to be the ruler the one that rushes to become business partner – or, rather, partner in crime – to the banker, and not the other way around. Proof of that is that this is what happened when the first central bank, the Bank of England, was concocted.