The Banker-King and Banker-Politician Criminal Conspiracy, 4

History then shows a progressive replacement of kings with politicians, of tyranny with democracy, of subjects turning into citizens… apparently. And in the process it doesn’t seem to show any significant decrease of the squandering, but rather its worsening, if ever. This means that if something has changed, it may be the crooks involved in this criminal conspiracy, in this robbing scheme, but sure enough not the basic plan at all. After all, in essence, the politician shares the same megalomania and crave for social engineering of the king, and simply adds to it the additional money needed to buy his or her own election.

King, politician, official? From the viewpoint of the criminal conspiracy, and particularly from that of its boss, who cares, as long as they have power to squander and create debt to the banker?