Crime Against Humanity: Hands Up and Give Us Your Wallet, 7
The point is that from the fraudulent crime of fractional reserve on, banking brokerage, dematerialisation of money and surveillance and interference with the use of one’s money progressed in parallel. And the point here is also that the progressive dematerialisation of money, quite in addition to all its other aims, is also instrumental to this specific aim: taking the proof of your right of property off your hands, and give it to more appropriate claws – pardon, hands.
The banking cartel is after seizing not only the monopoly of exchange of purchasing power, but the monopoly of certification of purchasing power itself as well. This second monopoly is something to confront fully as much as the first, if not even more: when we physically exchange a banknote, each one of us expresses his or her own agreement on that physical banknote, and he or she expresses it personally; when we tolerate that a closed system exists and monopolises both the circulation and the certification of our purchasing power, we are abdicating to our right and duty to exercise it personally. And this does not come without consequences.
Suppose A owns 100 units of purchasing power as 100 physical banknotes today and still owns them tomorrow; we acknowledge that A owns those 100 units today and we will still acknowledge the same tomorrow. Then suppose instead that A owns 100 units of purchasing power as a bank statement today, and tomorrow A goes to the bank and the banker says, “Who the hell are you, Mr. … Mr. … A? Security, will you please kick this Mr. A out!” Who is people going to believe? The banker, with all the weight of his standout social position, or Mr. A?
Of course this doesn’t take place today because word of mouth would spread and account holders would flee to competing banks, while Mr. A would turn to law enforcement for justice. In other words, the reason why this doesn’t take place today is because the oligo−monopoly is not strong enough. Not yet.
It won’t take place as long as the oligo−monopoly is not strong enough; but once it is? After all, who are the bankers accountable to as to what they enter in their accounting records?
