Crime Against Humanity: Hands Up and Give Us Your Wallet, 4

As we pointed out before, property is the legally protected right to the enjoyment of goods, and includes the power of disposition over them. Renting instead of buying opens the door to an increasing trend of power transfer from you to them over things. That is, zooming from the “infinitely small” to the “infinitely large”, ultimately an increasing transfer of sovereignty from you to them. This is in fact another case where the gist finds endless applications in day−to−day life, each of whom a negligible brick if laid on the walls under construction of a prison planet, one where you have to obtain permission for anything, breathing included, and to begin with.

If you think I’m overestimating how far this gist can go, here’s a case to put it in perspective, and at the same time show its place within the core mechanisms forming the moneypulators’ philosopher’s stone.
Four odd things have been observed on U.S. birth certificates: top left outside the form data, there is an unidentified, seemingly progressive number; the name of the newborn baby (last, first and second) is printed in all caps; the certificate is a copy issued on “special Bank Bond paper”; the certificate is authorised by “American BankNote Company”, as indicated within the form frame bottom. Well, that is the rationale that has been offered for such “oddities” by those who investigated them:
In 1913 the Federal Reserve Act was passed, creating the U.S. “federal”, “central” bank; after just twenty years, in 1933, the country was bankrupt: unable to pay its “debt”, while the private banks owning the Federal Reserve demanded “their money” back. That banksters did a good job of getting the country bankrupt in a mere twenty years supports the fact that it was a crime against U.S. citizens, and in the long run against humanity.
When one can’t repay debts, to still have credit to survive one has to have something else to pledge as collateral; guess what “something else” did a bankrupted government, with apparently nothing more left to collateralise, resort to? That “something else” is rather a “someone else”…