Crime Against Humanity: Hands Up and Give Us Your Wallet, 10
I face a similar difficulty because we’re going to face these subjects up ahead and so they risk being taken now less seriously than they ought to be, while quite to the contrary they have to be mentioned here because those subjects and this facet of moneypulation are the various complementary tools of the same core and to the same aim.
And that difficulty is as great as wide is the gap between what each of them looks like at a superficial glance, and what it actually is under that surface. Reality is no stranger to exceeding imagination, and Orwell’s 1984 is no exception.
To put the end result in the right perspective directly, with the least stretch of imagination, and without having to delve into the intricacies of how it is achieved through moneypulation combined with these subjects, let’s go witness the end of the separation of powers and their merger in the hands of moneypulators where basics mechanisms are clear.
Back to Example Island, we find some tens of people living there, but only one is the banker, legislator, judge, police commissioner, academia sponsor and press baron at the same time. Let’s cut to the chase:
We just got there, and the legislator dictates that people shall not be permitted to have cash anymore and that all the money shall be in the form of bank deposits and transfers, and the banker collects all the cash.
The banker then announces he shall have the final say on all money movements, at his discretion.
Then the banker announces usurious rates for all money related services.
Finally, the banker announces that he has confiscated all the money, and that everyone and everything is his property – us included.
At every stage, the people can’t turn to any competing banker, nor can they resort to any “upright” legislator, “impartial” judge, “serve and protect” police commissioner, academic “expert” or “free” journalist; quite to the contrary, they all enforce and endorse the banker’s will. For the very good reason they’re all the same person. And even though outside example island they’re different persons, they all nonetheless eat out of the same banker’s hand.
If we don’t stop putting our hands up and handing our wallet over to the moneypulators, do you think that getting there is still a matter of “if”, or just a matter of “when”?
