Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 15
Following on for a moment from central banks while we’re on the subject of these statistics measuring the speed of the ambiguous money cycles, it is fitting to mention here the role of central banks in such schemes, and to do it in quantitative terms: even setting aside the long, hard−fought and shady war about the very existence of the United States’ Federal Reserve, it has been observed how since its creation in 1913 the Dollar has lost 95 percent of its purchasing power: an unimaginable figure before its establishment. And in the meantime we’re supposed to venerate these proverbial wolves in sheep’s clothing as the almost mystical dykes protecting us from this outer unfathomable sea of inflation…
Even leaving aside that all money magically springs up in the hands of the usurpers of monetary sovereignty, thus intrinsically entailing the small detail we now know as the infinite debt trap, do you really think the real economies of the abovementioned countries grew at the same ratios in the same time spans, so as to substantiate such increases of monetary supply with real increases in production of wealth? As someone said, look don’t think. The difference between the expansion ratios of money supply and of real products and services is but the debasement speed of money; what we’re facing is the speed at which the cancer is deliberately made to metastasise: the speed at which the current ambiguous money cycle is being pushed straight down on us.
As already mentioned, “destroyed” value is actually always stolen: inflation is confiscation. Hidden confiscation: what the eye doesn’t see the heart doesn’t grieve… not only until the frogs are boiled, but until the sky falls on their heads, too. Can you see now how deep and how far the impact crater of the final Apocalypse goes? I mean, first observe in history the social impact of the final expropriation at the end of each “small” cycle perpetrated by the bankers by first extending cheap credit and then withdrawing it. Done? Good. Then observe in history the social impact of the final monetary collapse at the end of each “big” cycle perpetrated by the ultimate usurpers of monetary sovereignty by progressively hollowing out money. Done? Good. Now suss out in the future the social impact of the final monetary collapse at the end of a “big” cycle gone global.
