Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 18

Those already experiencing the worst conditions are pushed even lower, and the increasing starvation pushes them into an understandable increasing frenzy as the problems get more and more tragic and the solutions more and more impossible, and we do know what an explosive combination is having to solve a life−and−death problem without any solution at hand and without any hope in sight: the sacrosanct revolt of the victims becomes less and less an exact, efficient, effective, decisive action pointed at the correct target and turns more and more into a rash, violent, harmful, destructive and indecisive war among the poor – a war among the potential trouble sources unwittingly playing out of despair in the hands of their suppressives.

Which criminals are trying to ride which waves of violence in which directions by promoting which sides as good or bad is not the point; the point is, when something explodes, many people get hurt. It has been said that wartime leaders get sanctified no matter how much bloodshed they’re responsible for, and peacetime leaders get forgotten no matter how much bloodshed they prevented. And while one reconsiders history from this point of view, one wonders as well how much bloodshed, among other unspeakable things, the moneypulators behind the ambiguous money cycles in history are ultimately responsible for.

But it ‘s not these social explosions among the poorest people that mark the end of the cycle; to the moneypulators they are but fireworks to light up their party with some bloodshed, certainly not to put an end to it.
Really too bad the party has to end anyway, sooner or later. How is the day of reckoning coming? In what form the redde rationem shall arise? And above all, to whom? Who will take a loss?