Crime Against Humanity: Booms & Busts, the So-Called “Business Cycle”, 4

Now, orders of magnitude aside, I previously said there is no reason under the sun for “down” parts of “business cycles” but suppression; now it’s worth pointing out that this applies to any “down”: cycle or no cycle, regardless of being part or not of whatever “cycle”, any “down” in itself is only a matter of suppression, period.

Recession is the economy that trends dramatically down, with decreasing production, increasing unemployment, and all the rest of suppression effects. Stagnation is a lesser degree of recession, in that the economy trends down less dramatically or even stays level; it is however negative because of the missed wealth or improvement – whatever that improvement is – and also because it tends to last. Stagnation and recession are expected by the mainstream economists to be mutually exclusive with inflation, because inflation would result from abundant and cheap money which, as blood in the organism, should stimulate people to undertake, invest… and get into debt with the moneypulators, goes without saying. And then stagflation contradicts such mainstream expectation, in that stagflation is stagnation or recession occuring in the presence of inflation.
Since it is moneypulators who decide how much money exists, and in whose hands as well, the cause of stagflation could be that, while in the phase of throwing chum into the water, their impatience and greed take the upper hand, and so they keep for themselves a higher percentage of the money they create and grant a lesser percentage of it to their targets: us.
After all, we have seen in the ripple effect of inflation above, and here in the “business cycle”, what is their goal and plan in the first place: the money created is intended to roll down their pyramid of accomplices and servants anyway, hence a little fidgeting with their taps won’t alter significantly the intended course of events: a financial bubble storming across a starving world.