Crime Against Humanity: the Holy GAAP, 36

Ladies and Gentlemen, please welcome Orwell's 1984. Be very well aware this is the minefield we're moving in here. So be very well aware as well of the viewpoint you must assume on definitions and misunderstoods: one thing are the majority agreements, one thing is personal integrity. It has been said that what is true for you is what you observed yourself, and it is true on the basis of your observation, your actual observation, and of your actual observation alone, and that is personal integrity, regardless of how many judges may dictate otherwise on the basis of interpretations, loopholes and misunderstood words agreed upon by whatever majority.
I support the viepoint that justice is in the substance, rather than in quibbles. The letter of the law is at the same time incontrovertible and susceptible to infinite misunderstood words, interpretations, cavils and loopholes, and any law can be turned inside out at any time by whoever commands enough agreement to do so, and this is another reason why I favour the substance over the form, in addition to personal integrity, sense of justice and, last but not least, common sense. The world is a ship and people is its crew; safe successful navigation is the product of all the right decisions taken in the right places at the right moments by those which are on the ground, and the requisite for that is that each individual personally must evaluate correctly, and that is a matter among that individual and reality, directly and without intermediaries bypassing his or her judgement.
I say this because I gathered here all of the above in this spirit, and I invite you to pay more attention to personal integrity, definitions, misunderstood words and substance rather than to interpretations, cavils and loopholes agreed upon by weighted majorities, which are part of the problem, rather than part of the solution.