Suppression, 3

Toxic personality, from the Greek “toxicon”, poison, is rather self−explanatory, while narcissist indicates that he or she considers others as inferiors and supposed to serve his or her worship of self, and manipulator highlights that he or she consequently does use others heartlessly, and so invites a study of how he or she acts, what he or she does, of the means used to achieve his or her purposes.
Conscienceless, remorseless and ruthless explicitly refer to the idea that the individual just lacks a specific component, described as the sense of good and evil stemming from the sense of connectedness to one another, a state where the only barren purpose left is using one’s fellows as mere pawns to dominate and destroy.
Sociopath highlights a condition, the state one is in, which is the potential determining the type of actions that can originate from, that can be expected, and who is to expect these is indicated by the prefix coupled with the suffix “pathy”: “socio”, meaning “society” – all of us.
Sociopath and Luciferian are purposely put near each other as I deem their juxtaposition inspirational: from the viewpoint of rivalry between materialism and metaphysics, it proves we’re all on the same boat when it comes to getting to the core – that type of individual – and hence that rivalry too is most likely to be instigated by him or her; from the viewpoint of the facets highlighted by each label, the multiple meaning of Luciferian continues to widen and deepen the profile. While the sociopath can be such due to either brain or spiritual missing or malfunctioning parts, the Luciferian was described by religion as aiming at either the possession of souls or the totalitarian rule of the superior over the lesser – a hell in both cases, the only difference being with the degraded consensus or the terrified hatred of the victims –, or the plain death for all the peoples, thus bringing in both cases the aims of that type of individual to an entirely different level regardless of whatever missing or malfunctioning parts.
Antisocial then begins the shift from the potential to the action, and highlights how that condition is the potential of an individual actively causing troubles to the society rather than just having difficulties with it passively, acting against one’s fellows rather than being subjected to them.