Suppression, 12

And that’s where we get somewhere, in terms of practical predicting: never underestimate the destructive potential of a suppressive by thinking that he or she will be restrained by the threat of succumbing personally. Here’s where using the more wide, thorough and far−sighted definition may come to our rescue: Based on the concept of sociopathic, we would assume he or she would settle for abusing us and we would drop our guard accordingly. Based on the concept of suppressive, we assume he or she won’t settle for nothing else than reducing and keeping us to our lowest possible terms or, better still, and thus whenever possible, our outright extermination, so we know we can never afford to drop the guard.

What does “Economic Suppression” mean, then? The intention and/or the act of deceiving, defrauding, robbing, degrading, enslaving, nullifying, murdering and the alike by economic means. And it does not just mean merely infiltrating the endeavours of people to survive to the aim of exploiting them to one’s shady and supposed advantage. It does mean infiltrating the most fundamental endeavours of people to survive to the aim of perverting them so they produce for that people the contrary of survival. It’s an entirely different intention.

(By the way, now that we’ve dealt with both terms, “economic” and “suppression”, and noticed how economics is about survival and suppression is head on against it, we see how almost everything is economics, and therefore how virtually every suppression is economic suppression; hence, the title “Economic Suppression” turns out to be just a touch pleonastic. So, I confess I chose it in order to reach you as fast as impinging as a title and a cover can, and have to, so as to have a chance to get you in touch with all that starts here.)