Suppression, 13

Why calling things with their name? To prevent being deceived into excusing deliberate intention as “mistakes”, as “sorry, didn't know the gun was loaded,” instead of just saying “NO!” An example? High frequency trading. Stock exchange speculators have found out how to bleed you white of your last quids: in the same time a human needs to carry out a single transaction, computers carry out countless transactions; even though each one yields very small profit, there are so many of them that the sum of their profits becomes meaningful. But the point here is they're are automatic and fast. This means that you have boarded a crowd on the boat, and if one individual moves, all the crowd follows him so fast that the boat capsizes before you even notice the first one moved. So, if they even try to tell you they didn't mean it, that it was unintentional, that's immaterial; you may concede as arguable their awareness of the social effects of their speculations, and you may even concede as arguable their carelessness of such effects, but sheer results are what counts and are not subject to discussion. The law contemplates the crime, not its reason, right?

Just as the character has been generally recognised as a bit of a problem, so has been the fallout. After all, if the character is a problem, it is so due to the fallout. Since I move forward here to stating that the root cause of any condition that is low, worsening or refusing to improve, of any hardship, decline, failure, ruin throughout our whole history traces back to the suppressive, and since the “what” or, rather, “who”, entails the “how”, it appears simply consequential that that “how” has been investigated, too, as a subject in its own right, hence resulting in the isolation and labelling of some lists of common denominators, of some of the suppressive’s distinctive schemes of action.
As it has been observed that the suppressive achieves destruction by manipulating others undetected as such, such schemes of actions are referred to as manipulative tactics, and as diversionary tactics. Much highly informative literature is easily available on the subject, hence suffice here to rapidly mention a few terms, through which one can find such literature: