Crime Against Humanity: the War on Cash, 2

·        Wiping definitively out any chance for the citizen to escape their monopoly.

Maybe you didn’t notice, but private banking cartels have attained near monopoly over all our economic acts. As a body lives thanks to blood circulation and breathing, so a society lives thanks to exchanges of products and money, and the only exchanges of money that do not pass through their monopoly are those in cash.

By now we should have learned by experience that one of the worst enemies of Man is monopoly, of any kind, in any form, without exceptions. Therefore it should be clear to us what does the presence of a monopoly mean right within the economic exchanges thanks to which society lives and breathes.

Eliminating cash means sanctioning the ultimate triumph of this monopoly.

The justification is that it is meant to fight crimes and evasion? Let alone that by definition if something needs to be justified then it is implicitly wrong in the first place, the actual data prove this justification false, including the fact that the real crimes are perpetrated at infinitely higher levels than cash.

George Orwell wrote Ninety Eighty−Four for this, too, and every human being ought to know it and understand it thoroughly. And, moreover, it has been said that they that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety and they will very quickly lose both. And also that part of the duties of a true group member is never permitting that the errors of some be used to enslave all. And this also because that is exactly what is enacted consistently.

·        Opening the door to the ensuing maximum exploitation of their monopoly.

Moneypulators with their private banking cartels are not only after the monopoly over the flows of money, but also after the monopoly of certification of its property. The certification that cash is our property is that it is in our hands, and the people that live close to us and know us can witness that we earned it honestly. By eliminating cash we abdicate and give up exercising this vital function of the certification of property of money personally, transferring it to third parties, which what’s more are distant and separate both physically and in terms of interests, and this puts in the hands of such third parties the corresponding power over us.