Crime Against Humanity: the Bill, 4
By the way, worth repeating it once again, this highlights quantitatively as well the two reasons why bankers and their waiters fight a war against cash. One is quantitative in fraudulent terms: transactions in cash prevent bankers from exploiting the fractional reserve fraud in full; the less cash around, the more fractional reserve potential unleashed; one hundred percent of transactions in cash, zero percent of fractional reserve potential unleashed; zero percent of transactions in cash, one hundred percent of fractional reserve potential unleashed. The other one is quantitative in sheer totalitarian terms: achieving monopolistic control over all transactions, with all that this paves the way for, as the bankers tighten their grip over the law, towards a full arbitrary unaccountable power over anyone's money and transactions. And we do know what all that does mean, don't we?
So, how much is the bill?
According to Giacinto Auriti and Marco Saba, the amount of purchasing power stolen from the citizens by the bankers is the sum of the public debt multiplied by the inverse of the fractional reserve requirement. Thus, supposing the present fractional reserve requirement being two percent, according to this calculation the current amount of public debt multiplied by one hundred and divided by two is the amount of purchasing power stolen from all the citizens; dividing it by the number of citizens, you get that stolen from each citizen individually.
It is worth emphasising that this amount is quantified in terms of monetary units and that, considering the effects of moneypulations on the various aspects of production, of survival, of civilisation and of well−being, or their absence, it would certainly be eye−opening and worthhwile to quantify it as well in other concrete terms of life or death such as harvests, peace and prosperity or famines, wars and ruins.