The Cancer Stage of Economic Parasitism, 11

As a representative of both enforcement and protection categories we can mention all the legislation and measures propagandised as aimed at fighting crime by tracking circulating money: as we have previously seen, on the enforcement side their real hidden purpose is enforcing the parasite’s monopoly on circulation of purchasing power and the taxation power that goes with it, while on the protection side their other hidden purpose is providing the parasite with enough power to nip dissent in the bud. And since their goal is absolute monopoly, hence their constant pressure towards the expansion of such legislation and its scope of application.
And the study of economic parasitism and cancer has further pointed out how the three major requirements of a parasitical money system are now already fully in operation worldwide: any money exclusively in the form of state−authorised currency, all economic transactions subject to taxation, loss of monetary sovereignty on the part of the governments in favour of private moneypulators. If you mesh these gears together, you have the whole vital flow from the victims to the parasite. It is from this point of view that the real meaning can be understood of the “right of individuals to make economic transactions between themselves free of state surveillance or interference”, of the “no taxation without representation” founding constitutional principle, and of the constant and increasing hostility of legislation and legislators toward those foundations.

The parasite quests for increased metabolism
And just as it is interested in covering its back with wrong statistics and in targeting the right ones, the parasite is interested in maximising its exploitation of the latter. Here’s where parasitism and cancer really become interchangeable synonims. And this is a key point where parasitology and oncology shed light on economy as subject to economic suppression: an increase in the victim’s vital flows is an increase in the parasite’s vital flows; and an increase in the vital flows beyond what is good for the victim, where that increase becomes pathological and detrimental, if not lethal, for the victim, is still good for the parasite. At least as long as the victim survives; after which a biological parasite may even starve to death, whereas an economic parasite will devour the remains of its host and then will find its next victim.