Rule Over the Environment, 6

Well, so much for the “what”. What about the “how”?
The main reason why the cases above are here as examples is not to focus on what they can do; that “what” they can do is staggering.must not distract us from what is the point here, but on the contrary ir must let us concentrate on it: “how” they can do that? In fact, these two cases are here as examples of that “how”, too: Griffin wisely drew our attention on the fact that any cartel has to be created by legislation and sustained by the power of government, either by force or, preferably, under the deception of protecting its victims – us. And in both cases that is exactly what banksters achieved: their will and their robbery became law. This requires a consenting legislative body. Being that legislative body elective, this in turn requires an electorate at the very least not dissenting. Being the orientation of the electorate based on their judgement, knowledge and will, this in turn requires education and media at the very least not dissenting. And having at their service what is known as social engineering.
And social engineering, by the way, is composed of two specific branches; not only sowing, but the preparation of the soil as well: not only manipulating us to implant what we’re supposed to “spontaneously” think, but making us more manipulable so as to make these implants easier and firmer, too. And that’s where the abyss of the real Pandora’s vase opens up inside us, behind our gullible back.
That is what I call the banksters’, the moneypulators’, the suppressives’ environment. And that is what I call control over the environment. Or, rather, rule over the environment. That their will and robbery became law is the evidence of such rule.

It has been said that many ways of having fun cost money, isn't it? And now we know someone does have the money. What sorts of fun will the moneypulators and their leg pullers toy with, exactly?