Rule Over the Environment, 2

I discussed “the Creature from Jekyll Island case” before under the crime against humanity known as central banking; now the point is, that the banksters brought their Federal Reserve home demonstrates their degree of control over their environment.
If ever need be to put things in the right perspective, it is worth reminding a couple of circumstances of this case. It was about setting up the biggest ripoff of a whole huge nation ever since its formation, and stopping a nation−wide trend of real economy and people freeing themselves from their yoke and thriving. Quite differently from today, central banking was not taken for granted at all at the time, but on the contrary it was something new and, what is more, however short its track record had managed to be terrible; such track record being public knowledge, it raised strong objections and dissent rather than acceptance and support, as much among politicians and journalists as among the people, which at the time were quite less apathetic than today.
Such was the environment the banksters managed to control.

Perhaps I should call “the Not−So−Junk Bonds case”, “the thrifts and the not−junk bonds parable”, if not “two birds with one stone”…
Fact is, as history repeats itself, they once again had the same common problem: how to reverse an adverse trend. A trend expressible not only in the aforementioned terms of loss of market share and liberation from economic savery, but also in terms of big fishes keeping the small fry subjugated. And their common goal was, indeed, in terms of two birds with one stone.