Losing Game or Trojan Horse? War as a Suppression Tool, 7

We know war is the most expensive humanoid folly. So when rulers want to embark upon one, they need that much purchasing power. If they levied it on people openly through explicit taxation, the amount would be so intolerable that people would have no choice but to tell the rulers to shove it, cost it what it may.
We know inflation is a theft in the form of a hidden tax. Whoever is allowed to create purchasing power out of nothing at zero cost, usually in the form of fiat money, steals with it purchasing power from people. Moreover, being hidden, people do not realise being robbed, and above all much less realise who the robbers are.
So thanks to the creation of a money which is both token and fiat, that is, backed by nothing having intrinsic value and whose acceptance is forcefully imposed, and thanks to the ensuing robbery of purchasing power through the hidden tax called inflation, rulers can afford to unleash their lunacy and throw both their and other peoples in the hell of war.
Yes, but… is that all?
We know about the mechanisms of debt money and about the banker−king and banker−politician criminal conspiracy, so we can answer this simple question: who profits the most from these crimes against humanity? The answer to that question will enable us to answer another couple of questions as well: Who is the puppet and who is the puppeteer? Which of them is the most dangerous suppressive or PTS at the root of it all?

At that point we may probably consider war as an ultimate failure and betrayal of the basic goal of life to survive in the first place, which is rather self−evident. We may then consider war an overwhelming evidence of how silly can we get, but this would hardly tell us anything new. To be more precise, we may consider it as an overwhelming evidence of how PTS can we get. And then wonder: how is it possible? How can suppression have such a hold on us? What makes us so vulnerable, exactly?