Losing Game or Trojan Horse? War as a Suppression Tool, 6
So welcome as well to the age where people allowed suppressives to achieve an unprecedented power to turn their fellow men into potential trouble sources and thus unwittingly serve their deepest goal: everyone else in the world plainly dead…
In fact, to put such deepest goal of theirs somewhat in perspective, at this point it is apt to make a couple of remarks. It has been acutely observed that governments, not people, make wars. And it has been just as acutely observed that if the crimes that a government commits in one day were committed by an individual, that individual would be immediately shut in a prison cell, and probably even in a padded cell.
These remarks bring back to the light of our attention something we already knew. Once our eyes are reopened, another remark can at that point bring to our attention something else, something that we may not be aware of…
Such remark is that without moneypulation governments could not afford wars. In other words, without moneypulators we, our loved ones and our fellow human beings would not be doomed to deprivation, starving, misery, tragedy, butchering, massacre and destruction.
Maybe it is worth pausing one moment to consider the scope of this remark (for which we must thank G. Edward Griffin in his The Creature from Jekyll Island). And then a second moment to consider it in detail.
In the words of Jacopo Castellini, “Had Piedmont kept to its gold backing, it certainly couldn’t have the liquidity required to wage war on the rest of Italy and, at the same time, it couldn’t expand its public debt so much. A situation similar to that the United States find themselves in today, whom, by letting debt−money be printed without gold backing by the Federal Reserve (private), find themselves with the biggest public debt in the world and with a budget burdened by the highest military expenditure of history. A similar role to that of Piedmont at the time, in the Italian Peninsula, that is, of international policeman on behalf of third parties.”