Losing Game or Trojan Horse? War as a Suppression Tool, 5

Later on I will discuss what it’s called “The Third Party Law” in greater depth, but I already said that its fundamental is that behind any conflict breaking out or never resolving between the two or more parties involved, the real cause is always a hidden third party actively fomenting it. Again, this is a good time to point out how serious this is. Maybe with another example.

Many reaserchers, such as A. Ralph Epperson, G. Edward Griffin and Jim Marrs, on the basis of historical facts and also of official biographies of the Rothschild family and statements from German chancellor Otto Von Bismark, report how an “International Banking Syndicate” decided to “pit the American North against the South in a divide and conquer strategy, to provide the solvent U.S. federal government with an enemy that would require massive war expenditures and subsequent debt”. But their plan didn’t end there; should the war result in the Southern independence, then each of the now independent Southern states would be a candidate for having an autonomous central bank… European−controlled. And we now know about moneypulation and central banking, isn’t it? But their plan didn’t end there either: just like in Europe for centuries, those states could be thrown into an endless stream of wars between each other, with the ensuing endless stream of huge profits from loaning to the states involved. On the other hand, the bankers were afraid that the United States as one nation would attain economic and financial independence, and thus upset their financial domination of the world.
The bankers’ Trojan horse was slavery. A simply perfect Trojan horse: any compassionate human being would agree with those claiming they were fighting slavery. The facts, however, were that the North of the United States was industrialised, and attracted immigrants willing to work in conditions of economic slavery, thus did not need declared slavery, while the agrarian South still did; meanwhile, the technological advances made the demise of slavery only a matter of time, but the bankers’ emissaries nevertheless exploited and fomented the question of slavery, because it was their Trojan horse to start a civil war.