Crime Against Humanity: Pensée Unique in Economics, 64

And while we’re talking about the dimentions of this operation, we may consider the above as a sample of its depth; therefore as a sample of its width we may as well briefly indulge in the peculiar spreading among economic schools of thought of this strange disorder that leads them to stubborny refuse to see what’s in front of their nose and look the other way, when it comes to monetary sovereignty. What makes the spreading of this illness even more interesting is that it extends to economic schools that are rather antithetical, and even not quite mainstream.
In the synopsis I said: until we plug up the drain, fighting over the taps while the tub drains is not only a waste of resources, but red herring as well; politics is but a mass diversion weapon to divide us and distract us from solving economy: the smokescreen to keep us in the hamster wheel rat racing to death. Does the so−called “Right” say that to honour our debts we must restore our balance by tightening our belts? Does the so−called “Left” say that to honour our debts we must relaunch our balance by spending more? Both would be partly right, if it weren’t for the tiny, insignificant detail that that debt is intrinsically fraudulent and inextinguishable.
Now I add: I hope that tiny, insignificant detail now be even more clear, and that economists take an active part in this operation, too, be equally clear.
As the role of economists in this operation is akin to that of politicians, their script of seeming contrast is, too, and the same “Right” and “Left” labels can be applied without much need for adjstument.
So the dimention of this operation in terms of width may well be measured by how much apart these “Right” and “Left” of the Pensée Unique in Economics are.

As to the relevant examples, I have the honour to draw from the works of Daniele Pace: in his The Fruiterer Conspiracy, Pace exposes the Austrian School as an example of troops deployed to the “Right”, while in his article MMT: il banchiere che vorrebbe salvarci dalle banche? (MMT: the banker who would save us from banks?), he exposes Modern Money Theory as an example of troops deployed to the “Left”.