Crime Against Humanity: Pensée Unique in Economics, 55

Postulating that markets are in equilibrium to occult both the fact that they are in disequilibrium, and its cause: markets are rationed by moneypulators.
Postulating that actual output equals potential output to occult both the effect, that actual output is less than the potential output, and its cause: credit rationing by moneypulators.
Postulating both Gross Domestic Product and money supply as blurred overall entities to occult the fact that production and finance are two distinct and separate flows, and thus occult the very existence of finance which, controlled by moneypulators, speculates and grows at the expense of production.
Even though these occulted factors are just the beginning, not yet the sancta sanctorum, there could be already enough to conclude that the deductivist method is intrinsically fraudulent: if your purpose is concealing something and diverting attention from it, then I guess that you may hardly concoct a method more aligned to such a purpose than deductivism.
Incidentally, it could be expected that deductivists, or rather their instigators, and inductivists are at war over historical memory and empirical data, for the obvious reason that these are the archives of past and present reality on the basis of which inductivists can belie deductivist frauds. And since we know there exists an overall suppressive pressure aimed at destroying individuals, and that destroying what one knows is part of destroying one, then we also know what any push in that direction on the part of deductivists essentially is.

As to making the plunderer right and the victim wrong, to this aim the Pensée Unique resorts to its roots: its vision of Man and the world, and hence of the economy.

Crime Against Humanity: Pensée Unique in Economics