Crime Against Humanity: Pensée Unique in Economics, 54

The Pensée Unique in Economics is a strategical instrument of concealment and diversion put to work universally, not a tactical one uncommonly used. I trust that you find this obvious, and that therefore you can easily notice how its various facets are universally applicable – and universally applied.
Among its obvious key concealment and diversion functions there are: keeping us away from the truth of the matter and from inductivism which unveils it and exposes deductivist lies, making the plunderer right and the victim wrong, and fooling the victim into believing there is no attacker and no attack going on and thus into dropping any defence and rolling out the red carpet for the attacker.

As to keeping us away from the truth of the matter, deductivism is its very framework, and it conceals both the effects and their causes, both the facts and their perpetrators.
It conceals them thoroughly and systematically by deliberately omitting them from the outset, in all its deductivist axioms unsupported by facts, and then deliberately omitting them all along, in all its ensuing deductivist assumptions unsupported by facts either. And we know that the most difficult crookedness to detect is what ought to be there and it’s not.
In light of this it takes on a certain relevance how deductivism – or, rather, the driving force behind it – educates economists, and other professions and people too, to reject reality: individually and collectively, in any possible way, through any possible state of consciousness, from wilful to hypnotic, and we know how that goes, don’t we? With an inclination to certain events such as the “relegation to secondary status of those branches of economics that do look at reality”.
And to put in perspective both the concealment and diversion function of the Pensée Unique and its being based on deductivism, reviewing some of the instances previously seen might come in handy: