Crime Against Humanity: Pensée Unique in Economics, 4

The list is almost infinite, their ideological, political, economic natures and positions are rather varied and often conflicting, and this draws our attention on the fact that they have only two things in common: media visibility and that agreement on the “Pensée Unique in Economics”. Which in turn brings us back to the aforementioned second level of agreement: regardless of how conflicting in other issues, and regardless as well of whether they are plain dumb or playing dumb, there is, however, something basic they all agreed upon, and that is the “Pensée Unique in Economics”. An agreement which obviously includes turning an ironbound blind eye to all the facets of moneypulation we are now aware of.

At the risk of sounding pleonastic, the Pensée Unique in Economics is a case in point of the unsuspected depth of the second level of the agreement, that on what is real. Provided they’re in good faith, all the aforementioned opinion leaders have their wings unknowingly clipped by it; if on the contrary they’re in bad faith, then they have a field−day in having our own knowingly clipped by it. In both cases, they do influence our lives; and ourselves.
So, are we really sure that King Pensée Unique has any clothes at all? Let’s open the bonnet and inspect.

A good workshop manual mapping what is what under that bonnet is New Paradigm in Economics by Richard A. Werner; the attention dedicated to following the wires is more than rewarded by the understanding of what’s going on, what parts are doing what in that previously inextricable jumble. Seek and ye shall find. And on the contrary missing out on it leaves one at the mercy of an oppression that gets more and more powerful and misterious as its undiscovered twistedness is permitted to operate undisturbed.