Overflight, 124

ENVIRONMENTALISM A SUBSTITUTE FOR WAR
It is beyond the scope of this study to prove that currently accepted predictions of environmental doom are based on exaggerated and fraudulent "scientific studies." But such proof is easily found if one is willing to look at the raw data and the assumptions upon which the projections are based. More important, however, is the question of why end−of−world scenarios based on phony scientific studies — or no studies at all — are uncritically publicized by the CFR−controlled media; or why radical environmental groups advocating socialist doctrine and anti−business programs are lavishly funded by CFR−dominated foundations, banks, and corporations, the very groups that would appear to have the most to lose. …
People of the industrialized nations have been subjected to a barrage of documentaries, dramas, feature films, ballads, poems, bumper stickers, posters, marches, speeches, seminars, conferences, and concerts. … No one questions the damage done to the economy or the nation. … Not one in a thousand will question that underlying premise. How could it be false? Look at all the movie celebrities and rock stars who have joined the movement.
While the followers of the environmental movement are preoccupied with visions of planetary doom, let us see what the leaders are thinking. The first Earth Day was proclaimed on April 22, 1970, at a "Summit" meeting in Rio de Janeiro, attended by environmentalists and politicians from all over the world. A publication widely circulated at that meeting was entitled the Environmental Handbook. The main theme of the book was summarized by a quotation from Princeton Professor Richard A. Falk, a member of the CFR. … He said: «The basis of all our problems is the inadequacy of the sovereign states to manage the affairs of mankind in the twentieth century.» The Handbook continued the CFR line by asking these rhetorical questions: «Are nation−states actually feasible, now that they have power to destroy each other in a single afternoon? … What price would most people be willing to pay for a more durable kind of human organization — more taxes, giving up national flags, perhaps the sacrifice of some of our hard−won liberties?» …

Overflight