Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle

From time to time mathematicians remind us that a straight line is but a curve of an infinite radius, and indeed the more the steering wheel is straight the more difficult it is to notice we’re going in circles. Part of the value of history is providing us with enough comparable items so that we can say, “But… I’ve been through here before… And there’s a ravine ahead!” Moreover, that comparable items can be different occurrences of the same thing or different things similar in some respects teaches us the importance to think in terms of common elements, of similarities and differences.

Now that the banker has seized political power through the criminal conspiracy with the politician, the road is paved to the stage where the question isn’t “if” anymore, but rather “how”, “how much”, “how fast” – that is, how to streamline the flow at unimaginable orders of magnitude? How to fully exploit the infinite fraud potential now at arm’s length?

So let’s discuss here explicitly what I mention here and there that I would call the “Ambiguous Money Cycle”. In my opinion, though commonly used, “Gold Standard Cycle” is actually a bit of a misnomer, while Ambiguous Money Cycle is perhaps a more tight fit, a label somewhat more revealing of the real contents of the package. Its function for the moneypulators is similar to that of politicians: to them, they are useful consumables used in combination; only, politicians last much less and have to be replaced more often. The function of both is to lure people into entrusting them with all their attention, hope and trust, so that the moneypulators can thoroughly exploit and squeeze them all. I previously mentioned this mechanism in discussing the parallel metamorphoses of goldsmiths into bankers and of money into currency, so we already know what an ambiguous money is; now let’s discuss it and its cycle as themselves: another moneypulators’ crime against humanity.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 2

The ambiguous money cycle is basically a confidence trick, in that it gathers and exploits people’s trust – usually a trust blind in full or in part. By the way, it replicates on a higher plane the preceding cycle of deliberately inducing intrinsic value in some commodity originally devoided of it, such as gold; only, it replicates it even more devastatingly on an even more bigger scale. In fact it could be said that it is one of the biggest cases of confidence trick in human history.

All this confidence trick consists of is preventing people from realising that “the King has no clothes” while progressively taking off his clothes; the more people can be prevented from realising it, the faster and the more the “King” can be undressed. Mathematically, sort of, the ambiguous money is a variable passed off as a constant, and the yield of the swindle is equal to the difference between the amount of clothes the people believe the King wears and the actual amount worn, multiplied by the duration in time of this blunder. Let’s drop in at Example Island: today, the moneypulator who seized the monetary sovereignty has a money in circulation and has the people believe its intrinsic value is A while its actual intrinsic value, and therefore actual cost for the moneypulator, is B. As of today, the ripoff amounts to A minus B. During the night, the moneypulator debases the money, that is, reduces its actual intrinsic value, from B to B1, and at the same time manages to support people’s belief of its intrinsic value with some abracadabra. Tomorrow, as a result of the combination of debasement and abracadabra, people now believe the intrinsic value of money is A1. As of tomorrow, the ripoff amounts to A minus B for today, plus A1minus B1for tomorrow. And time keeps on going by… Hence the goal of the moneypulator is keeping the difference between believed and actual intrinsic value as high as possible for as long as possible.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 3

In pursuing their criminal aims, the moneypulators exploit, hence have a vested interest in feeding, if they do not even deliberately cause, that well−known humanoid attitude towards money that seems to stem directly from the one stone age Man had towards fire: people worship any kind of money, whether gold or paper, be it with induced intrinsic value or without even that, as if they were hypnotized in front of some sort of supernatural magnet charged with mysterious energy and powers. It has much to do with “look, don’t think, in other words, observe what’s in front of your nose, please”, and proof is a case of a lecturer showing a slide picturing Monopoly money, Federal Reserve notes and solid gold American Eagle coins, asking which one is not like the others, being answered “Monopoly money” by an audience of university professors and “solid gold” from an audience of five year old children, and wondering who’s smarter.
The point is, the greater that power of suggestion, the farther they are from seeing both money and moneypulators for what they are: a tool vital for the community, and its merely criminal hijackers. The whole point for the latter is that the intangible plane of that attitude yields its fraudulent results in the tangible plane, with people considering the substitute, fiat money, in the meantime more and more substitute for pure and simple nothing, as a value in itself beside the value it substitutes or pretends it substitutes; as if the measuring tool was equal to the measured product and began to exist as an additional unit of product beside the actual one.

The more money is a hypnotic fetish, the more the usurpers of your monetary sovereignty, the robbers of your purchasing power, are entitled in your hazy eyes to its face falue as if it contained actual value and they incurred in actual costs to acquire it – which is all a filthy lie. As to this, it is also interesting to observe how debt money and ambiguous money cycle are synergetic: the more people is conditioned to consider currency as backed by some intrinsic value somewhere – which is more and more false – the more they are willing to accept that the holder of monetary sovereignty issues debt fiat money and loans it at face value as if it cost something to the latter – which is more and more false –.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 4

Such humanoid attitude towards money is further eased by a sort of mental inertia: just as it affects objects resisting their changes of direction in space due to their mass, so inertia affects minds resisting their updating in time due to lowering their guard. At any moment within an ambiguous money cycle its victims identify the money of yesterday with the money of today. And the whole point, instead, is they’re not the same money at all.

The harsh truth is, there is no reason under the sun but fraud for a state or anyone to borrow at face value plainly valueless currency created out of thin air.
Pure fiat money in itself would not be bad as long as monetary sovereignty belongs to its legitimate owner – you –, as long as we are all perfectly aware it is fiat money without any intrinsic value whatsoever from its very inception, and as long as it is not debt money and no ambiguous money cycle takes place. A pivotal feature of money is that of being store of value in time, and a money is made ambiguous for the very opposite aim: drilling a hidden hole at the bottom of your water supply.

For the sake of clarity, let’s consider a full ambiguous money cycle, full in the sense of moving through all the forms of money.

It starts with a money having full intrinsic value: what you see is what you get, and, say, that coin is in pure gold and its worth equals its weight exactly. People get used to it and everything’s fine, except maybe a possible excessive scarcity of money which limits exchanges and thus the development of the social potential for wealth.

Then moneypulators begin to debase money by watering down gold with increasing percentages of base metals. It has been observed how those “replacement” base metals are selected according to their attitude to mimic gold and silver; whatever the cause of this inclination to value certain metals, now its inertia begins.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 5

Firstly, it may take quite some time before people realise the coins in their hands today are different from those supposedly equivalent in their hands yesterday, to realise those of today are less valuable than those of yesterday, to realise those of today are much more abundant and abused, and so begin to require more of them in exchange. Secondly, all this process can be further slowed down by the inertia, which rather automatically drives people to treat today’s money as yesterday’s even though they’re aware a debasement has occurred, acting much like if they moved to a country where a different language is spoken and they went on using their native language as a leftover reflex to the degree they’re lost in thought. Thirdly, let’s not forget that all this can take place to the degree people will tolerate it, and so that degree of tolerance is a war front; we’ve already seen how Thomas Jefferson supposedly said that when the government fears the people you have liberty, and when the people fear the government you have tyranny, and the willingness of people to tolerate it can be increases by any means, overt or covert, physical or psychological: law, propaganda, abracadabra, violence, you name it.

Next stage is when the moneypulators start to lay the foundations for a whole new order of magnitude of debasement through proxy money. In studied nonsense, the moment they start to introduce something else other than the real thing, at the same time they label it as the real thing: paper money enters the scene, and they label it “Gold Standard”. Paper money slavishly reiterates the course of gold money: fully loaded at the outset, and from there on furtively and incessantly hollowed out until its empty shell collapses on the victims. Now the trick consists of presenting paper money as a proxy for gold at its inception, and from there on making it less and less so, while exploiting the difference between how much people believe it is and how much it actually is during the whole course of the cycle.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 6

In the beginning of their so−called gold standard, the paper money issued by the holders of monetary sovereignty bears a legend to the effect that it is receipt money, such as “payable in gold to the bearer on demand”; as we previously said, it pretends to exist for the sole purpose of easing and thus encouraging the circulation of purchasing power and thus production, exchange and wealth. This initial stage is also called, or described as, full convertibility, meaning that receipt money is “fully backed” and anyone is free to redeem it in gold at will without any restriction, but in actual practice ease of use takes the upper hand and people get accustomed to using paper, and so psychologically the consideration of value begins to seep from gold into paper; that is the real purpose of the whole manoeuvre, and its speed is gauged on the speed this seepage takes place in the minds of people. At that very speed starts that next stage of the same evolution towards all the benefits for the criminals and all the damage for the victims, as the need of society of a more abundant medium of exchange is perverted into a Trojan horse that puts all the related purchasing power into the hands of the usurpers of the monetary sovereignty.

You know how that goes: little by little, step by step, things get loosened, blurred, confused… “attenuated” is the term, actually. “Gold Standard” becomes “Classical Gold Standard” as something other than what is currently labelled “Gold Standard”, “Gold Exchange Standard”, and the like. The actual value proxy money should be a receipt for is put increasingly out of the reach of people: redemption rights are made more and more difficult, remote, obsolete, until eventually outlawed, either implicitly in “commonly accepted” practice – accepted by whom, one may ask – or explicitly in law; both possession and ownership of gold – or of wathever the backing value is – follow suit, and one fine day on the paper money there’s no more trace of the “payable in gold to the bearer on demand” legend any more. In the meantime, the same accepted practice or explicit law reserves its more friendly side to the moneypulators, granting them the privilege to issue an increasing amount of receipts for the same amount of actual value: increasingly more paper money for the same gold.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 7

Again in the meantime, a suitable propaganda machine is set up everywhere – media, academia, whatever you gaze upon – to pave the way unnoticed to moneypulators and their ambiguous money. It has been observed that the survival of knowledge is not a foregone conclusion at all, and that it can be forgotten by simply detracting attention from it. The unnoticed “ethnic cleansing” perpetrated by the propaganda machine demonstrates who it works for: they carefully combed gold and actual value out of insiders’ curricula and out of popular culture, to the point that as of today two generations of both scholars and people already don’t even understand their role, and they carefully brainwashed people against them and in unquestioning favour of indiscriminate proliferation of unbacked paper money. An unquestioning favour carefully steered away from the other side of the coin: the confiscation of purchasing power by inflation, and by creation of money out of thin air, in the hands of the moneypulators, incidentally, a little detail no one seems to notice or care about. Together with the other peculiar detail that while propaganda is busy obliterating the very notion of intrinsic value to the benefit of fake value, the market quotation of the first keeps on outperforming the latter. One wonders why…

Then moneypulators take the whole scheme to an even bigger level and turn proxy money into full−blown fiat money. No new, additional or changed strategy is required; paraphrasing the saying, “Do not change a winning strategy”, just upshift and continue to accelerate. The gear change consists of getting rid of the very concept of actual value backing the money issued by the moneypulators. To the degree people has been reduced to identify the proxy with the real thing, and fooled into the hallucination of believing that the proxy contains the value of the real thing, the real thing can be euthanized without raising too much dust. Now, the sky is the limit.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 8

And indeed at this stage the order of magnitude of the scam is going sky−high, a level just a bit difficult to figure out for the man in the street at ground level – which is by the way the core target of a rising perfect storm: long gone is not only whatever control of people over money, but even their awareness of its inner functioning, while for the moneypulators all restraints have been removed, both legal and physical, to its infinite proliferation and ramifications. In fact, as they create more and more money, it is consequential that its forms multiply; credit cards, debt cards, scriptural money, dematerialised money, whatever form, the point and the common denominator is, they’re all created in their hands and they all aim at an “ideal” form: totally under their control at zero cost. But the front of this rising perfect storm is finance: “stealing purchasing power by conjuring tricks with money”. And the rise of the tide is measured by the finance to economy ratio: how many units of money in “existence” for a unit of product, of real value.

The rise of the tide is best described in the words of Thomas Jefferson: “first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property”. These words can only be underestimated, and one of the reasons is a wrong approach to history. History teaches us if we analyse it in terms of constants and variables: what are the common denominators? What are the recurring, or even cyclic, schemes? Which causes are going to produce which effects regardless of the specific circumstances in each individual case? We have repeatedly seen how a source of purchasing power at zero cost is an unbridgeable competitive advantage that sooner or later enables one to seize everything and everyone by economic means, and once the concept is clear how it is implemented is easily deduced: the moneypulators in possession of monetary sovereignty defeat any competition in buying out businesses and properties, then extend their unbridgeable competitive advantage to their controlled businesses which use it to defeat any competition in their turn, so they keep on accumulating market share, and oligo−monopolies keep on consolidating in the hands of moneypulators.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 9

It is interesting to note here how they perpetrate this in two distinct cycles; the one explicitly mentioned by Jefferson is the more circumscribed one: banksters open the money tap to entice people to get into debt, and then close the tap to expropriate them once indebted; the one we’re covering here is the other cycle: the wider, if not global, one. In a nutshell, these are their differences: the “small” cycle is perpetrated by bankers against their customers in the medium term without altering the nature of money; the “big” cycle is perpetrated by the ultimate holders of a monetary sovereignty against a whole people in the long term through the alteration of the nature of money.

It has been said that the “big”, “Gold Standard”, ambiguous money cycle goes through these seven stages:

In the first stage money has full intrinsic value, whether incorporated or as a proxy backed by it, and this, together with the intrinsic ethical drive of people, produces some wealth.

In the second stage some start to bite off more than they can chew, if not to plainly get a swelled head: the wealth feeds the temptation of both plain thieves and lunatic leaders to exploit public office as the ideal Trojan horse to get hold of some extra quids or extra power for free or at the expense of others, hence they steer the institutions towards a trend of increasing ambitions, power, meddling and ensuing insolvency. By the way, we do know how it goes with that sort of spontaneous humanoid combustion for which one “can’t be wrong” and “knows better”, isn’t it? The more one gives in to this, the more it grows and builds walls around one, imagine when it is further fuelled by dishonesty… here’s then another case of the lethal combination of potential trouble source puppets and suppressive puppet masters: from here it’s downhill all the way through to the destruction of society.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 10

In the third stage, as appetite comes with eating, plain thieves and lunatic leaders start to get the hang of promising people the moon by snatching more than they give in exchange, so here the step change is the ambition to bully the neighbourhood and snatch by crook what they can’t take by hook; hence they steer the institutions towards another trend, that of building up muscles: an increasingly massive military apparatus and the ensuing acceleration of costs and insolvency.

In the fourth stage, as by dint of fiddling with one’s toys and with the idea of ransacking the neighbours sooner or later one moves from words to deeds, there wars break out; and there wars continue, too, in a further trend towards a state of perpetual war – and ensuing drastic hike of costs and insolvency; after all, war is the most expensive idiocy under the sun, and what someone spends someone else earns…

In the fifth stage, most of the pigeons begin to come home to roost – more or less spontaneously, since as we have seen this is harvest time for those who sowed the whole cycle in the first place… As we noticed there are two ways to screw people, overtly or covertly, the second being the easier one; the weight of the induced insolvency of institutions can be dumped on people overtly to the degree they apathetically put up with it, and now that weight has raised well beyond that degree, so it’s time to go about it covertly. Whether this stage starts now to fund war or it was already underway and now just speeds up, this is the stage of debasement of money getting rampant: thieves and leaders begin to heavily exploit monetary sovereignty to create purchasing power out of nothing, by either reducing the amount of precious metals in coins, replacing coins with paper, or whatever confidence trick.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 11

By the way, when this scheme is perpetrated through central banks, there are simpletons invoking the so−called “helicopter money”; their reasoning makes perfect sense: since we ordinary people are all sinking into the same monetary quicksand, would central bankers please be so kind to pass the new money along to anyone directly as if it was thrown at the mob from a helicopter, instead of alloting it all to their fellow bankers who not only then profit from lending it to us, but also use it to pay to themselves stellar rewards and bonuses for crashing the world economy? Would anyone please remind those simpletons that robbers usually have a marked tendency to keep for themselves both the loot and the murder weapon rather than share them with the victims of their robberies?

Confidence tricks need trust, hence any form of propaganda plays a role here in passing off betrayal as help to people. A cute example is an old black−and−white newsreel called “The War Finance Division, United States Treasury Department presents: The Double Duty Dollar”. Its message is clearly expressed in its ditty: “We’re the dollars of the nation on parade… We’re the biggest batch of dollars ever made… Oh we used to march by millions… but now we march by billions… and maybe we’ll be trillions before you’re dead!”. Setting aside the final joke, in bad taste but less unfounded than it looks at first sight, what is interesting to observe is the way it aims at getting its message accepted. On the one hand, it titillates the rudimentary emotions of the viewer with the clichés of its period: the message is singed by a cheerful choir while smiling dancers wear giant coins as tutus; on the other hand, no critical reason is given as to why the viewer shoud accept the message as positive; so the viewer is subconsciously led to identify money with wealth. Really too bad it’s someone else’s wealth at the viewer’s expense… As we do now know, inflation is confiscation: purchasing power created out of nothing is not actually created, but stolen from the already existing purchasing power in the hands of people.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 12

Moreover, we now know that usually banksters, not thieves and leaders in the institutions, usurp monetary sovereignty, hence we know as well that usually these inflationary schemes are intended to accelerate the sinking into the odious debt and through it into an infinite debt trap.

In the sixth stage you begin to reap what they sow, and by dint of them crying wolf, no one believes you anymore when the wolf bites you. Indeed no one of us can phyisically count all the pieces of money in existence every day, and there’s a whole bunch of tricks to conceal the real amount of money in existence, too, hence alas there is a “fraudological” delay between the creation of a new unit of money out of nothing and the people perceiving its putting into circulation and diluting as a result their consideration of the value of each unit. But this fraudological delay is not infinite, and sooner or later, after the fifth stage has been backed up as long as possible, that is, the trust of unwary people has been exploited as much as possible, the loss of purchasing power becomes so heavy and so fast that even the frog begins to realise the water is getting hot, people start to lose faith in that money, and who knows how fast that money will become wastepaper.

In the seventh stage the fuse ends and the bomb explodes. The moment ambiguous money becomes wastepaper has finally come: people’s trust in it is over, no one values and thus accepts it anymore. When a bomb explodes many innocents get hurt, so I think it is righr and proper here to pause and consider the size, the effects, the consequences of the crisis caused by the final monetary collapse at the end of an ambiguous money cycle.

Again, I think a comparison with a living organism comes in handy, so just imagine what happens to a living body when it is suddenly deprived of all its blood as the means to convey all the vital flows all its cells depend on to survive.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 13

Survival depends upon production and exchange of survival factors, and the medium of exchange has been destroyed; the fate of any production, of any exchange and of any living entity are suddenly doomed. The problems shift from plans for the future to food and shelter now. Food, health, energy, work, security, mobility, communication, you name it: whatever survival basic, there is no more.

But that’s not all yet. Unfortunately, the pressure of hardship, depressing people down, brings out the worst out of many of them: some are wise and loving enough to strengthen their sense of brotherhood and their drive to help, but alas many are liable to slide along the stages of selfishness from indifference to beastliness. Hence the more starved the people, the more the starving is likely to be further aggravated by an increasing amount of degraded thought and behaviour and of wars among the poor, of brothers set against each other apparently by famine and hardship, fighting over a bone instead of realizing that famine and hardship are not a cause but an effect intended and caused by someone. In other words, the grievous mechanism of dwindling spiral, where each worsening makes further and deeper worsening easier and more likely and any improvement or recovery more difficult and less likely. And since this spiral gnaws at the very heart of the basic drive to survive, that the innate ethics of people at some point does a miracle, stands up and breaks this spiral is not at all a foregone conclusion, as proved by the long list of extinct peoples and civilisations.

So much for the depth of this crime against humanity; the other dimension that qualifies it as such is its breadth. There are always those reluctant to confront it; they claim that’s not true, or subordinately that this time is different. Well, fact is there’s a list of extinct moneys that’s maybe even longer than that of extinct civilisations. And that any ambiguous money enters such list is just a matter of time.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 14

There are those who bothered to assess whether any fiat currency in history ever evaded this criminal cycle and survived, and the peremptory answer is, NO. No one, never. They said that even though there were six hundred of them in just the first letter and a half of the alphabet, every single one of them went to zero. This lends some credibility to the conclusion that monetary history just repeats itself: same criminal cycle, same usurpation of monetary sovereignty, same ambiguous money cycle, same plunder by the usurpers, same doom for the people. Not true? This time is different? Definitely vital to be aware something called history does exist. And definitely useful to be aware of what goes on now so as to compare it to the past, particularly in case one is still dubious. So, where are we now?
First, virtually all the moneys under the sun today are fiat currencies; I mean, all of them. Second, here are some rough sample figures of the exponential increases of their money supply:
US Dollar went from 45 billions in 1965 to 850 in 2008, to 2,740 in 2012.
Canadian Dollar went from 23,000 billions in 1968 to 217,000 in 1995, to 890,000 in 2013.
Australian Dollar went from 10 billions in 1975 to 45 in 1991, to 280 in 2012.
South African Rand went from 1 billion in 1975 to 13 in 1992, to 160 in 2012.
Russian Rouble went from 375 billions in 2001 to 6,000 in 2012.
Singaporean Dollar went from 15,000 billions in 1991 to 48,000 in 2006, to 130,000 in 2012.
Indian Rupee went from 7,500 billions in 2006 to 17,300 in 2012.
Chinese Renminbi went from 1,130 billions in 1999 to 6,000 in 2012.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 15

Following on for a moment from central banks while we’re on the subject of these statistics measuring the speed of the ambiguous money cycles, it is fitting to mention here the role of central banks in such schemes, and to do it in quantitative terms: even setting aside the long, hard−fought and shady war about the very existence of the United States’ Federal Reserve, it has been observed how since its creation in 1913 the Dollar has lost 95 percent of its purchasing power: an unimaginable figure before its establishment. And in the meantime we’re supposed to venerate these proverbial wolves in sheep’s clothing as the almost mystical dykes protecting us from this outer unfathomable sea of inflation…

Even leaving aside that all money magically springs up in the hands of the usurpers of monetary sovereignty, thus intrinsically entailing the small detail we now know as the infinite debt trap, do you really think the real economies of the abovementioned countries grew at the same ratios in the same time spans, so as to substantiate such increases of monetary supply with real increases in production of wealth? As someone said, look don’t think. The difference between the expansion ratios of money supply and of real products and services is but the debasement speed of money; what we’re facing is the speed at which the cancer is deliberately made to metastasise: the speed at which the current ambiguous money cycle is being pushed straight down on us.

As already mentioned, “destroyed” value is actually always stolen: inflation is confiscation. Hidden confiscation: what the eye doesn’t see the heart doesn’t grieve… not only until the frogs are boiled, but until the sky falls on their heads, too. Can you see now how deep and how far the impact crater of the final Apocalypse goes? I mean, first observe in history the social impact of the final expropriation at the end of each “small” cycle perpetrated by the bankers by first extending cheap credit and then withdrawing it. Done? Good. Then observe in history the social impact of the final monetary collapse at the end of each “big” cycle perpetrated by the ultimate usurpers of monetary sovereignty by progressively hollowing out money. Done? Good. Now suss out in the future the social impact of the final monetary collapse at the end of a “big” cycle gone global.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 16

The previous two cases are not only meaningful in themselves; they’re also meaningful as preparatory steps to raise one’s ability to confront to the level required, because if it takes some courage to confront their social impact, to confront an even bigger social impact it takes even more courage. Furthermore, the previous two cases are available as history, if a bit subject to concealing and red herring, while the final case is rather unprecedented, in addition to be subject to the same concealing and red herring, hence what I’m asking you to confront now is not that trivial.

When a cataclysm hits, people flee; indeed chances of escape depend upon mobility, but even before that they depend upon a first requisite: somewhere to escape to. Is there anything worse than a flood? I’m afraid yes: a Great Flood.

The foundations of the Great Flood in the offing were laid in another crime against humanity we’ve seen before: a major – if not the main – case of international seigniorage in modern times: the United States from the world wars on. In covering the case in terms of international seigniorage above, once the flow of dollars out of nothing in exchange for real products was running at full capacity, we stopped at the edge of its inflationary effects, and from there we now resume. Not before I’ve pointed out that if it wasn’t the United States it would have been another country, and for the real puppeteers that would merely represent a horse change.

I said that the country exercising international seigniorage has to reinvest some of the loot in possibly unspeakable ways to keep want for its money up and demands for its redemption down abroad. But despite those additional crimes, hardly the scam can last forever.

While it lasts, though, in addition to all the adverse effects for the world previously discussed, there are those of a more inflationary nature: the world has agreed to use the money of the nation exercising international seigniorage, and thus myriads of peoples having something to put aside have stored their savings in that money, while further myriads of peoples having just nothing to put aside struggle to scrape together some of that money to merely survive.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 17

Imagine what happens to those peoples as the masters of that money proceed with the cycle of its ambiguity by hollowing it out more and more. Inflation is confiscation: every new unit of that money in the hands of its masters means less purchasing power in the hands of those peoples. Those who had something to put aside and put it aside, now do not have it anymore. Those who had nothing to put aside and struggled to survive, now cannot make ends meet and put together dinner with lunch anymore.
Deceit is a cornerstone of fraud, playing with words is a cornerstone of deceit, and a case in point is the now fashionable label “quantitative easing”, for whatever it would mean literally if it ever had any sense at all. Just to be clear, quantitative easing means nothing else and nothing more than what we’re talking about here: the usurpers of the monetary sovereignty proceeding to create more and more money out of nothing in their own hands and to steal purchasing power to the world with it, let alone all the additional adverse effects, and such quantitative easing is part of the current ongoing global ambiguous money cycle. Well, it has been said that during the second round of quantitative easing global food prices went up 60 percent and this created a humanitarian disaster for the two billion people on earth who live on less than two dollar a day.

At which point famine starts to bring about a full further category of adverse effects for people; and they are not the consequences of famine, they are the consequences of that which caused the famine. Just as in a flood destruction goes where the water goes, so famine produces such effects where that inflation goes, where it takes its heaviest toll: on the poorest peoples.
What is this further category? Social explosion. Statistically and historically, it has been observed how when the ratio of their income going to food reaches 40 percent people resolve that the risk−reward ratio is worth staging a revolution. And revolutions tend to lead people from the hot frying pan into the even hotter fire.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 18

Those already experiencing the worst conditions are pushed even lower, and the increasing starvation pushes them into an understandable increasing frenzy as the problems get more and more tragic and the solutions more and more impossible, and we do know what an explosive combination is having to solve a life−and−death problem without any solution at hand and without any hope in sight: the sacrosanct revolt of the victims becomes less and less an exact, efficient, effective, decisive action pointed at the correct target and turns more and more into a rash, violent, harmful, destructive and indecisive war among the poor – a war among the potential trouble sources unwittingly playing out of despair in the hands of their suppressives.

Which criminals are trying to ride which waves of violence in which directions by promoting which sides as good or bad is not the point; the point is, when something explodes, many people get hurt. It has been said that wartime leaders get sanctified no matter how much bloodshed they’re responsible for, and peacetime leaders get forgotten no matter how much bloodshed they prevented. And while one reconsiders history from this point of view, one wonders as well how much bloodshed, among other unspeakable things, the moneypulators behind the ambiguous money cycles in history are ultimately responsible for.

But it ‘s not these social explosions among the poorest people that mark the end of the cycle; to the moneypulators they are but fireworks to light up their party with some bloodshed, certainly not to put an end to it.
Really too bad the party has to end anyway, sooner or later. How is the day of reckoning coming? In what form the redde rationem shall arise? And above all, to whom? Who will take a loss?

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 19

As I said, when a criminal commands his victims at gunpoint, if his victims outnumber him, sooner or later he’s going to run out of ammunitions, and that’s the dawn of the showdown when pigeons start to come home to roost.
For one reason or another, at some point some country gets in a position to decide it’s not going to play this self−destructive game anymore, and regardless of how much it denounces the scam publicly it begins demanding redemption of that fiat paper money in actual value.
What we’re looking at here can be seen as well as a form of bank run. Or, more accurately, both collapses of ambiguous money cycles such as those of international seigniorage and bank runs are different cases of the same showdown:
When the people know what they’re doing and thus “the government fears the people”, a bank run ends with the fractional reserve banksters properly hanged, while when the people do not know what they’re doing and thus “the people fear the government”, it’s the other way round, with people hanged for the crimes of banksters with the ropes called bank bailouts.
Unlike indebted countries defaulting on a debt which is unconcealed from its very inception, collapses of ambiguous money cycles underpinning international seigniorages are much more powerful explosive devices that explode directly in the hands of much more unsuspecting people; hence one’d expect that people, at least when they know what they’re doing, would come down on such a crime with the toughness it deserves. But it seems we’re hardly going to see such a happy end, whether people know what they’re doing or not, as witnessed by our case in point of the United States’ Dollar.
As the country exercising the international seigniorage went certainly on exploiting it far and wide for quite long before getting the bill, as a consequence the amount of fiat money put into circulation for what they are going to be held accountable will be rather huge.
That means, it exceeds by far any collateral, any reserves of actual value such as gold, and any potential for delivery of actual product, the country may ever have as well. After all, wasn’t living above one’s means the whole purpose in the first place:?

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 20

Moreover, in addition to having nothing to give in exchange to redeem that flood of paper, all that paper repudiated abroad that returns home threatens to flood the country: the country went on “exporting its inflation”, as they say, and now that inflation is going to come home to roost, too. And since what was “esported” worldwide is all returning to a single country, the order of magnitude of this accompanying inflation is that of a flood – a Great Flood. No way!

Back to our case in point, so much fractional reserve scam the United States practiced that at a certain point not even two thirds of the world’s gold accumulated thanks to the world wars was enough to back it up any more. A huge bank run −style Great Flood loomed in the distance, approaching fast. So wide was the tsunami front that calling them all subversives would fall on deaf ears, as there would hardly be anyone left that was not worthy this label.

The solution to this cul de sac was the historical turning point of midsummer 1971: the United States’ President Nixon tells the word, “You know what? We’re not going to redeem our dollar in your hands in gold any more. Suck it up. That’s all, folks.”
Aside from being a tad euphemistical, it may be not immediately evident that such statement could be reworded otherwise.
If it weren’t the United States’ superpower speaking, but any third world country defaulting, it may sound like that:
“Dear Creditors, we’re too weak and defenceless to dare say whether the insolvency and debt we sank in are legitimate or odious, but in either case we’re here, hat in hand, begging you not to hurt us too much in foreclosing the family jewels we have left.”
And if they’d stop with the charade and the euphemisms, in the outright abstract terms of out exchange it may sound like that:
“You know what? We no longer intend to honour the obligations we pretended to assume to you in exchange for the actual products you gave to us. We no longer intend to even pretend to be indebted to you: we got all your products in exchange for nothing, furthermore we intend to continue to do so indefinitely, and that’s that; so what?”

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 21

“So what?” The answer to this question is another interesting point. Some answered it with another question: “Why didn’t the rest of the world rush out and hang him?”
Because this is what happened: nothing. The rest of the world, in fact, just went along with it; tacit consent, sort of. Why? Well, in my opinion there could be a compound of three reasons.
Possible reason number one is obvious: they chose the lesser evil. It’s understandable: a huge part of the media of exchange circulating in the world’s bloodstream are dollars, and a huge part of the wealth of countries and individuals is stored in them, so denouncing the Dollar as wastepaper almost overnight would be a nightmare. Then the world would have to foreclose the United States: that would be a second nightmare, and not only because there would be a bit of resistance on their part, by hook or by crook.
Heard this story once: a chap was entitled to a compensation from an insurance as the injured party; he was summoned by the insurance and an officer told him, “You are entitled to the compensation, we do not contest that. But we are not going to refund you. Sue us, if you like.” He didn’t add “F*** you”, but it was implicit. Another time I heard that once you won the case and the other party is ordered to pay compensation to you, if it doesn’t you have to sue it a second time in order to obtain payment. This demonstrates that the law is not equal for everyone: justice has a cost, and the weakest can’t afford it.
Possible reason number two is they might fear a chain reaction: should the world realize that the moneypulations such as debt money, ambiguous money cycles and infinite debt traps are a universal bubonic plague, all voters and taxpayers might turn a scrutinising eye to their own rulers.
Possible reason number three is almost all the world’s rulers are but the puppets of the same puppeteers, and the mandate of them all is to keep the scam going.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 22

Anyway, back to the viewpoint of the ambiguous money cycle this time gone global, the midsummer 1971 announcement of the end of convertibility of Dollar in gold is a historical turning point also because it’s the moment almost all the world’s currencies have become fiat currencies. Until then other currencies were backed by dollar and dollar were backed by gold. Formally, at least; somewhat less in actuality, as we have seen, but let’s not split hairs. From then on the dollar, and therefore all the other currencies as well, were backed by exactly nothing. One giant leap for moneypulators, somewhat less for mankind.

Yep, because now that we have seen both the depth of the impact of the final collapse of an ambiguous money cycle dragging down the people with it, and how its breadth corresponds to the area permeated by that ambiguous money, it is time to estimate and then confront what is going to happen when this time that area and people are the whole world; when the flood is a Great Flood.

And in doing so we should not forget to include in the calculation that any damage should be double−counted, for the very good reason that any damage is there instead of the missing corresponding benefit: one for the damage, one for the benefit there could have been instead of the damage. The misery brought about via an ambiguous money plus, quite in addition, the loss of the prosperity a free, sound and honest money would provide.

Crime Against Humanity: the Ambiguous Money Cycle – Gold Standard Cycle, 23

Now, I invite you to consider in the light of all of the above what has been dug out and demonstrated about our current state of things by Daniele Pace in his The Fruiterer’s Conspiracy I mention in the heartily recommended readings:
The bankers, to the purpose of legitimating their usurpation of monetary sovereignty, use their power and their various fifth columns in politics, academia, media, etc. to impose this dogma under the guise of a mainstream economic theory, whose fallacy is put in the shade by their sheer firepower: 1) False problem: they exaggerate and demonise inflation into a bogeyman. 2) False cause: they assign blame for it to the excess of money created by governments. 3) False solution: they pass off as trustworthy bulwark the central bankers, whose freedom and independence from governments would enable them to curb the excessive creation of money, and by extention the whole banking system in general.
We have here a textbook case of the principle that “the criminal accuses others of his own crimes” – a case where the criminal even exploits such false and covertly autobiographical charges to deceive, defeat, seize and suppress his victims: the rest of us. The truth is rather different: the cause of inflation is not the excess of money in itself, but the possible excess of money in relation to the existing and exchangeable goods and services; the central bankers are the puppets of the bankers, they neither can nor want to curb inflation, but on the contrary they’re there to cover up the real cause of it, their puppeteer bankers whom use the usurped monetary sovereignty to systematically create money in excess with which they are seizing everything and everyone.