·        Wiping definitively out any chance for the citizen to escape their monopoly.

Maybe you didn’t notice, but private banking cartels have attained near monopoly over all our economic acts. As a body lives thanks to blood circulation and breathing, so a society lives thanks to exchanges of products and money, and the only exchanges of money that do not pass through their monopoly are those in cash.

By now we should have learned by experience that one of the worst enemies of Man is monopoly, of any kind, in any form, without exceptions. Therefore it should be clear to us what does the presence of a monopoly mean right within the economic exchanges thanks to which society lives and breathes.

Eliminating cash means sanctioning the ultimate triumph of this monopoly.

The justification is that it is meant to fight crimes and evasion? Let alone that by definition if something needs to be justified then it is implicitly wrong in the first place, the actual data prove this justification false, including the fact that the real crimes are perpetrated at infinitely higher levels than cash.

George Orwell wrote Ninety Eighty−Four for this, too, and every human being ought to know it and understand it thoroughly. And, moreover, it has been said that they that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety and they will very quickly lose both. And also that part of the duties of a true group member is never permitting that the errors of some be used to enslave all. And this also because that is exactly what is enacted consistently.

·        Opening the door to the ensuing maximum exploitation of their monopoly.

Moneypulators with their private banking cartels are not only after the monopoly over the flows of money, but also after the monopoly of certification of its property. The certification that cash is our property is that it is in our hands, and the people that live close to us and know us can witness that we earned it honestly. By eliminating cash we abdicate and give up exercising this vital function of the certification of property of money personally, transferring it to third parties, which what’s more are distant and separate both physically and in terms of interests, and this puts in the hands of such third parties the corresponding power over us.

The only limit to what those who conquered both the monopoly of its flows and the monopoly of the certification of its property can do with your money is criminal imagination. It begins with extortion, continues with interference, and ends up with confiscation.

Institutions such as judicial systems should defend us against this risk, and here one understands why monopoly is one of the main enemies of Man: even now we have an idea of the power of the private banking cartel; as their monopoly strengthens, it will swallow up such “Institutions”, and soon there will be nothing and nobody to defends us.

·        Expanding to the infinite their monopoly.

But the reason behind all this is backing the whole house of cards up, and making it possible, to the infinite.

You know that today central banks create only a small fraction of money, and that the great majority of money is created by the other banks: they call it “fractional reserve”. Only the central bank can create cash, and it is physical cash just in a minimal part, and the great majority is in “dematerialised” form. From a practical point of view, the “dematerialised” money created by the central bank and the “dematerialised” one created by the other banks are equal: both are in non−material form. But not at all in legal terms: today only the central bank has monetary sovereignty.

So why aren’t the other banks, that create money without having monetary sovereignty, prosecuted for counterfeiting?

Because what they create, legally, is not money but a promise of money. Juridically, the “money” circulating between our bank accounts in dematerialised form is not money but just a promise of money. The bank is promising us to deliver us “real” money, that is, created by the central bank, holder of the monetary sovereignty, at our request.

By the way, I consider that you are also aware of the reason why I write “real” money within quotes: we do know by now that central bank’s “real” money is made of the same indistinct substance both promises of money and nightmares are made: moneypulation. Only, a more sophisticated scheme is a better cover. But there’s a crack in that cover, and we’re here to put a wedge in that crack.

As the dematerialised money created by the central bank is indistinguishable from the dematerialised promises of money created by the other banks, the only way to have in our hands “real” money is requiring it in physical cash.

The moment we make this request is the moment we demand the bank to keep its promise: and to turn the promise of money into “real” money, it has to go and purchase the latter from the central bank, paying for it.

We are not corrupt pettifoggers, we are the interested parties: the citizens; we are interested in the gist, not in the tricks, and we are free to smell a setup.

The whole trick is passing off a promise of money as if it were money. And the trick holds up as long as nobody dreams of demanding that the promise be kept.

The fact that the banks create these promises of money out of nothing the very moment they loan them causes various misunderstandings, in good or in bad faith:

Some believe that the bank that issues them profits from interests alone, forgetting about the principal, but it’s not that way. Loaning involves being the owner of what is loaned.

Some believe that at the time the loan is returned the bank deletes its promises now returned, and with them its source of profit, but it’s not that way. It’s called “banking reflux”: the promises of money, once created out of nothing, never cease to exist, and with them the resulting source of profit.

Why? Because a promise of money can continue to exist until someone demands that it is kept, delivering the “real” money promised.

And all banks play along to one another, reciprocally accepting the promises of money they exchange as if it were money, instead of demanding “real” money.

Therefore, the private banking cartel of moneypulators is permanently committed with all its might to have us believe that its promises of money are “real” money. I am sure you can personally witness how successful their make−believe is.

And eliminating cash means their ultimate victory. It means removing the last chance for the citizen to demand that the promise be kept. It means forcing us to accept the promises of money created out of nothing at zero cost by the private banking cartel as if they were money, and to allow them to exist and circulate endlessly, safe from any unmasking. It means taking away from us even our last chance to prevent the private banking cartel from circumventing the law with impunity and usurping and exercising our monetary sovereignty de facto without having it. And therefore it means getting definitively under cover the house of cards thanks to which they are seizing everything and everyone.

As the criminal gets big−headed to the degree decent people let him, which includes coming out into the open instead of lying low, these days this is not idle theory, but amply documented reality: many central banks and governments are working to eliminate cash since long; EU, UK, USA, China, Canada, you name it… and guess what features they are planning for their cashless moneys?

·        Central bank to record all your transactions above, say, €50;

·        central bank to record your transactions if you exceed a spending limit of, say, €1,000 per month;

·        central bank to record your transactions if you exceed, say, 50 transactions per month;

·        any so recorded transaction to be considered “guilty until proven innocent”;

·        you cannot hold more than, say, €3,000 out of banks and other financial intermediaries, so you cannot use it as an independent form of investment;

·        it is programmable, so that it can – to say it in their own words – “help financial programmability”; that is:

·        the government or the central bank can impose spending restrictions or controls;

·        the government or the central bank can precisely control what you can and cannot spend your money on, as you can only spend it at government−approved merchants;

·        the government or the central bank can see all of their citizens’ account balances and transactions, and can go to a showdowns with political opponents by monitoring and tracking their financial transactions;

·        the government or the central bank can control who has access to money – Canadian people already had a taste of it, when the government froze the bank accounts of protesters and their family members and gave protestors permanent records, and the banks did some “policing” of their own and went even further, freezing a number of accounts that did not appear on the list of citizens given to them;

·        the government or the central bank can program money to expire within a certain amount of time;

·        link it to, or better said merge it with, digital identity.

Would you still call you hard−earned savings “yours”? Is that enough for you to take note which side are these criminals on? Now add that we know that appetite grows with eating, don’t we? And Edward Snowden, who does know about these things, said, “If those data are collected, someone will abuse them.”

So the defence of the survival of each one of us begins with the defence of cash.